Posts Tagged ‘Microsoft’

The User Should Control the Focus

Monday, December 7th, 2009

Launching Word… hmm, that’s gonna take a minute. Well, I’ll just pop back into Safari and check Gmail. Username, check. Password, ch… what the?… Why is my password showing up in Word? Oh, I guess my computer finally finished loading the app. It must not have realized (or cared?) that I was still in Safari, even though I was loading pages and typing. But, shouldn’t it continue to do the last thing I asked it to do? I mean, I shifted focus away from Word and towards Safari. Why should the computer forcibly change my focus. I’m the user, the commander, the “One Who Controls the Mouse”.

(more…)

Apps Make Your Phone Special

Friday, November 20th, 2009

VentureBeat has a post titled Microsoft’s Ray Ozzie: Apps don’t make your phone special, where they mention Mr. Ozzie’s comments at the Microsoft’s Professional Developers Conference. Mr. Ozzie is said to suggest that apps are not what will differentiate mobile platforms. His apparent take is that all apps will, at some point, be ported to all mobile systems. This would switch the driving force to something more than what apps exist. That is Windows Mobile marketing crap.

Google’s Vic Gundotra is quoted in the post too, and he seems to indicate even Google won’t develop for all mobile platforms due to cost. Many developers will develop for the Android and iPhone platforms, and maybe even the dreaded Windows Mobile. I think most won’t. Some long time Mac developers have already pulled out of iPhone development.

I can’t get an official Google Voice App on the iPhone. That app alone would make my phone special, to me. If that app was important enough, I might go with an Android handset. Are there other considerations in picking a mobile smartphone? I hope so. Network, OS, multi-tasking, feel, build quality, manufacturer, and more. I think Ozzie has a got ‘a’ point. The mistake is, he seems to indicate it is ‘the’ point. Ask any iphone user if they like their phone and they will generally respond yes, often following with a mention of Shazam.

Lets look at the history of the desktop platforms. If I want to use Aperture to manage my photo library: Mac only. If I want to use Microsoft Visio or Access: Windows only. Apps matter Ray, and sorry about the Windows Mobile insult.

Based on info from MacRumors, MacBytes & VentureBeat

T-Mobile, Sidekick & Microsoft = Danger – Updated 2x

Monday, October 12th, 2009

Let me start with a note from T-Mobile:

“Sidekick customers, during this service disruption, please DO NOT remove your battery, reset your Sidekick, or allow it to lose power.”

If you haven’t heard, there’s trouble in Sidekick City. The data for T-Mobile’s Sidekick users is stored on the cloud servers of a company called Danger, or I should say was stored there. This weekend, a server glitch (we’ll get to that in a minute) caused an almost certain loss of Sidekick users personal data. That means that contacts, calendar entries, photos and to-do list entries for a lot of people are gone. Did anyone at T-Mobile look at the company’s name? I mean storing important customer data on a company called SOL would not be allowed, right? But Danger is OK simply because it is Microsoft/Danger?

Microsoft acquired Danger in 2008 and, according to PCWorld,  their position is that it was Danger’s technology that failed and not Microsoft Technology. I don’t think there are a lot of Sidekick users thinking that makes it all OK. Most companies have backups, but it appears the company called ‘Danger’ did not. The T-Mobile note continues:

“Regrettably, based on Microsoft/Danger’s latest recovery assessment of their systems, we must now inform you that personal information stored on your device – such as contacts, calendar entries, to-do lists or photos – that is no longer on your Sidekick almost certainly has been lost as a result of a server failure at Microsoft/Danger. That said, our teams continue to work around-the-clock in hopes of discovering some way to recover this information. However, the likelihood of a successful outcome is extremely low.”

Someone at Microsoft must have wondered “could you have just said Danger instead of Microsoft/Danger”. Not good.

So how could this ‘glitch’ happen?

(more…)